Repository logo
 
Loading...
Profile Picture

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Main orientations of science education research and research types : a critical analysis of the most influential papers (1993-2002)
    Publication . Lopes, Zuíla Bernardino; Paixão, Fátima; Cachapuz, António
    In the last few years, there has been a trend inside the Science Education Research (SER) community to analyze the “health” of SER (e.g. Fensham, 2004; Gilbert, 1995; Horton et al. 1993; Jenkins, 2000; Millar & Osborne, 1998). Our aim is to explicit the relationship between the main orientations of science education research (for practice or theory) with research type (categories defined by Tsai & Wen, 2005, e.g. empirical, theoretical, position papers and revision research). The corpus of the selected papers was formed by the most influential SER papers in the period between1993-2002. Two main criteria were used to select the papers: i) Papers published in three of the most important international SER journals (SE - Science Education, JRST - Journal of Research in Science Teaching and IJSE - International Journal of Science Education); ii) Papers of a restricted group of “more times cited” in each year. We identified the 152 most influential papers: 43 from SE; 73 from JRST; and 36 from IJSE. Our analysis show that the empiric research type prevails among all main orientations of SER (for practice, for theory or for policy). Only a small group of studies is concern to find and make explicit the reference points of Science Education field. This work may contribute to transpose the fragmentation obstacle of present SE knowledge. A good start point would be characterize what we know about SE and identify the persistent problems and the new problems.
  • Where are we? A contribution to a better understanding of the state of the art in science education research
    Publication . Paixão, Fátima; Lopes, Bernardino; Praia, João; Guerra, Cecília; Cachapuz, António
    The purpose of this study is to add our efforts to those of researchers who have been concerned with a better understanding of the state of the art in Science Education Research (SER). The study focuses on the nature and evolution of the main SER lines, e.g. ,what researchers actually do when they enter the research community in order to develop Science Education. We believe that the exercise may help to reinforce the identity of SER, to gain a better knowledge of the field, and to make some educational proposals for mid-term priorities, in short, to foster the advance of Science Education knowledge. The corpus of the study was formed by the 152 most influential SER papers published from 1993 to 2002. Two criteria were used to select the papers: they had to be published in three of the most important international research journals, plus a criterion based on the citation index. Content analysis of the corpus indicates that Concept-Learning-oriented studies tend to make way for studies emphasising the role of the Philosophy of Science and also for multidisciplinary approaches such as STS. Thoughts for the development of the research field are put forward.