Browsing by Author "Chmil, Hanna"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Homo villicus in the cinema environment: justifiably and limits of the indexPublication . Chmil, Hanna; Korablova, Nadia; Bezruchko, Oleksandr; Zhukova, NataliaHomo villicus belongs to the sphere of symbolic, which allows different interpretations concerning the disability of the image of a person, which was created by it. Homo villicus is not a special innovation in the context of the reproduction of Homo images by modern philosophical discourse. New is its acratian, no governance strategy, which produces counter hegemonic discourse and represents a local fuss against the hegemonic discourse in the world landscape of philo-sophical exploration. The original technology of Homo villicus self demonstration is that the experience is living without previous presentations, by attracting modern expositions. This is another search for the path of cultural history on the terms of the human problem. The original technology of Homo villicus self demonstration is that the experience is living without previous presentations, by attracting modern expositions. Proclaiming the next image of Homo philosophy is included in the next game imaginary and real in culture, observing how it is modified depending on this concept of culture. The turn from cinema technologies to life and vice versa activates the place of intensive interaction of the mentioned factors in the problems of Homo villicus self-management and their consequences. Homo villicus trying to balance their twilight forces "builds him-self/herself" through "revolution in himself/herself." Homo villicus is not a static formal characteristic of a person, but another type n the knowledge of human nature in the cultural context, so another opportunity to characterize a culture when a person should be guided by social/common priorities and values, to have the ability to articulate them. The definition of "cinematic nature" of this process within the framework of the chosen problem allows to outline the limits of possibilities and appointment of cinema technologies in the growing alienation and exploitation of a person on the level of ontological principles and preconditions in their influence on the viewer as a subject of perception and creator of screen reality simultaneously